Open-Source AI · AI search engines

SearXNG vs SurfSense

SearXNG vs SurfSense compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. The private search layer behind AI search vs Search your own knowledge and the web.

Updated regularly · curated by OpenSourceAI.tech

Choose SearXNG for self-hosters wanting a private search backend. Choose SurfSense for research across personal notes and the web.

SearXNG vs SurfSense at a glance

SpecSearXNGSurfSense
CategoryAI search enginesAI search engines
TypeMeta-search engineResearch assistant
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
Runs locallySelf-hostedYes
Primary languagePythonPython
Ease of useIntermediateIntermediate
Best forself-hosters wanting a private search backendresearch across personal notes and the web
GitHub stars15.3k

How SearXNG and SurfSense score

🏆 Overall edge: SurfSense — 4.4 vs 3.8 / 5
CriterionSearXNGSurfSense
Popularityn/a3.5
Maintenancen/a5.0
Ease of use3.53.5
Privacy4.55.0
License freedom3.55.0

Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.

What each one is

SearXNG

Meta-search engine · AGPL-3.0

SearXNG is a privacy-respecting meta-search engine aggregating dozens of sources, widely used as the retrieval layer behind self-hosted AI answer engines.

  • Aggregates dozens of engines, zero tracking
  • The standard retrieval layer for local AI search
  • Battle-tested, easy Docker deployment
Visit SearXNG →

SurfSense

Research assistant · Apache-2.0

SurfSense connects your personal knowledge sources with web search into one research assistant with citations.

  • Searches your notes and the web together
  • Cites every source
  • Self-hosted and private
See the SurfSense page →

Key differences

SearXNG is meta-search engine, while SurfSense is research assistant. Their licenses differ (AGPL-3.0 vs Apache-2.0), which matters if you ship a commercial product. They also differ in how they run (Self-hosted vs Yes). In short, SearXNG fits self-hosters wanting a private search backend, and SurfSense fits research across personal notes and the web.

Which should you choose?

Choose SearXNG for self-hosters wanting a private search backend. Choose SurfSense for research across personal notes and the web.

There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.

Frequently asked questions

Is SearXNG or SurfSense easier to use?

Both sit at a similar level (Intermediate). Your choice should come down to fit rather than difficulty.

Are SearXNG and SurfSense free?

SearXNG is free and open source (AGPL-3.0), and SurfSense is free and open source (Apache-2.0). Neither charges for the core software.

Can I run SearXNG and SurfSense locally?

SearXNG: self-hosted · SurfSense: yes. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.

SearXNG vs SurfSense — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose SearXNG for self-hosters wanting a private search backend. Choose SurfSense for research across personal notes and the web.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.

Explore the directory →