Open-Source AI · AI search engines

SearXNG vs Farfalle

SearXNG vs Farfalle compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. The private search layer behind AI search vs Self-hosted answer engine with local models.

Updated regularly · curated by OpenSourceAI.tech

Choose SearXNG for self-hosters wanting a private search backend. Choose Farfalle for a private Perplexity on local models.

SearXNG vs Farfalle at a glance

SpecSearXNGFarfalle
CategoryAI search enginesAI search engines
TypeMeta-search engineAI search engine
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
Runs locallySelf-hostedYes
Primary languagePythonTypeScript
Ease of useIntermediateIntermediate
Best forself-hosters wanting a private search backenda private Perplexity on local models
GitHub stars3.5k

How SearXNG and Farfalle score

🤝 Too close to call — SearXNG and Farfalle land within a hair (3.8 vs 3.6 / 5). Pick on fit, not on score.
CriterionSearXNGFarfalle
Popularityn/a2.5
Maintenancen/a2.0
Ease of use3.53.5
Privacy4.55.0
License freedom3.55.0

Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.

What each one is

SearXNG

Meta-search engine · AGPL-3.0

SearXNG is a privacy-respecting meta-search engine aggregating dozens of sources, widely used as the retrieval layer behind self-hosted AI answer engines.

  • Aggregates dozens of engines, zero tracking
  • The standard retrieval layer for local AI search
  • Battle-tested, easy Docker deployment
Visit SearXNG →

Farfalle

AI search engine · Apache-2.0

Farfalle is a self-hosted AI answer engine that can run entirely on local models, searching the web and citing its sources.

  • Runs fully on local models
  • Cites its sources
  • Clean, fast interface
See the Farfalle page →

Key differences

SearXNG is meta-search engine, while Farfalle is aI search engine. Their licenses differ (AGPL-3.0 vs Apache-2.0), which matters if you ship a commercial product. They also differ in how they run (Self-hosted vs Yes). In short, SearXNG fits self-hosters wanting a private search backend, and Farfalle fits a private Perplexity on local models.

Which should you choose?

Choose SearXNG for self-hosters wanting a private search backend. Choose Farfalle for a private Perplexity on local models.

There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.

Frequently asked questions

Is SearXNG or Farfalle easier to use?

Both sit at a similar level (Intermediate). Your choice should come down to fit rather than difficulty.

Are SearXNG and Farfalle free?

SearXNG is free and open source (AGPL-3.0), and Farfalle is free and open source (Apache-2.0). Neither charges for the core software.

Can I run SearXNG and Farfalle locally?

SearXNG: self-hosted · Farfalle: yes. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.

SearXNG vs Farfalle — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose SearXNG for self-hosters wanting a private search backend. Choose Farfalle for a private Perplexity on local models.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.

Explore the directory →