OpenCode vs 
Sourcegraph Cody
OpenCode vs Sourcegraph Cody compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. Open Claude-Code-style agent for your terminal vs Codebase-aware AI assistant.
Updated regularly · curated by OpenSourceAI.tech
OpenCode vs Sourcegraph Cody at a glance
| Spec | OpenCode | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Coding assistant | Coding assistant |
| Type | Terminal agent | IDE assistant |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Runs locally | Partial | No |
| Primary language | TypeScript/Go | TypeScript |
| Ease of use | Intermediate | Beginner |
| Best for | a provider-agnostic Claude Code alternative | large codebases where context matters |
| GitHub stars | — | — |
How OpenCode and Sourcegraph Cody score
| Criterion | OpenCode | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Popularity | n/a | n/a |
| Maintenance | n/a | n/a |
| Ease of use | 3.5 | 5.0 |
| Privacy | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| License freedom | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.
What each one is
OpenCode
OpenCode is an open-source AI coding agent living in the terminal: a polished TUI, any provider (Anthropic, OpenAI, local), LSP awareness and a client/server design you can drive remotely.
- Beautiful terminal UI focused on real coding sessions
- Works with any model provider, including local
- LSP-aware edits and client/server architecture
Sourcegraph Cody
Cody answers questions and writes code with full context of your repository, using code search to ground its answers in your actual codebase.
- Grounds answers in your real codebase
- Works across many IDEs
- Strong code search backing
Key differences
OpenCode is terminal agent, while Sourcegraph Cody is iDE assistant. Their licenses differ (MIT vs Apache-2.0), which matters if you ship a commercial product. OpenCode leans more intermediate-friendly, whereas Sourcegraph Cody is more suited to beginner users. They also differ in how they run (Partial vs No). In short, OpenCode fits a provider-agnostic Claude Code alternative, and Sourcegraph Cody fits large codebases where context matters.
Which should you choose?
Choose OpenCode for a provider-agnostic Claude Code alternative. Choose Sourcegraph Cody for large codebases where context matters.
There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenCode or Sourcegraph Cody easier to use?
Sourcegraph Cody is generally the easier of the two to get started with, while OpenCode rewards more setup with more control.
Are OpenCode and Sourcegraph Cody free?
OpenCode is free and open source (MIT), and Sourcegraph Cody is free and open source (Apache-2.0). Neither charges for the core software.
Can I run OpenCode and Sourcegraph Cody locally?
OpenCode: partial · Sourcegraph Cody: no. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.
OpenCode vs Sourcegraph Cody — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose OpenCode for a provider-agnostic Claude Code alternative. Choose Sourcegraph Cody for large codebases where context matters.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.
Explore the directory →