Open-Source AI · Coding assistant

Continue vs OpenCode

Continue vs OpenCode compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. Open-source autocomplete and chat in your IDE vs Open Claude-Code-style agent for your terminal.

Updated regularly · curated by OpenSourceAI.tech

Choose Continue for developers who want a customizable in-IDE copilot. Choose OpenCode for a provider-agnostic Claude Code alternative.

Continue vs OpenCode at a glance

SpecContinueOpenCode
CategoryCoding assistantCoding assistant
TypeIDE extensionTerminal agent
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
Runs locallyCloud-optionalPartial
Primary languageTypeScriptTypeScript/Go
Ease of useBeginnerIntermediate
Best fordevelopers who want a customizable in-IDE copilota provider-agnostic Claude Code alternative
GitHub stars34.8k

Feature comparison

FeatureContinueOpenCode
Autocomplete
Chat
Agent mode
Local models
Multi-IDE
Self-hostable

How Continue and OpenCode score

🏆 Overall edge: Continue — 4.5 vs 4.0 / 5
CriterionContinueOpenCode
Popularity4.0n/a
Maintenance5.0n/a
Ease of use5.03.5
Privacy3.53.5
License freedom5.05.0

Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.

What each one is

Continue

IDE extension · Apache-2.0

Continue is an open-source IDE extension for VS Code and JetBrains that brings autocomplete, chat and edits using any model, including local ones via Ollama.

  • Works in VS Code and JetBrains
  • Bring any model, including local via Ollama
  • Highly customizable context and commands
See the Continue page →

OpenCode

Terminal agent · MIT

OpenCode is an open-source AI coding agent living in the terminal: a polished TUI, any provider (Anthropic, OpenAI, local), LSP awareness and a client/server design you can drive remotely.

  • Beautiful terminal UI focused on real coding sessions
  • Works with any model provider, including local
  • LSP-aware edits and client/server architecture
Visit OpenCode →

Key differences

Continue is iDE extension, while OpenCode is terminal agent. Their licenses differ (Apache-2.0 vs MIT), which matters if you ship a commercial product. Continue leans more beginner-friendly, whereas OpenCode is more suited to intermediate users. They also differ in how they run (Cloud-optional vs Partial). In short, Continue fits developers who want a customizable in-IDE copilot, and OpenCode fits a provider-agnostic Claude Code alternative.

Which should you choose?

Choose Continue for developers who want a customizable in-IDE copilot. Choose OpenCode for a provider-agnostic Claude Code alternative.

There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.

Frequently asked questions

Is Continue or OpenCode easier to use?

Continue is generally the easier of the two to get started with, while OpenCode rewards more setup with more control.

Are Continue and OpenCode free?

Continue is free and open source (Apache-2.0), and OpenCode is free and open source (MIT). Neither charges for the core software.

Can I run Continue and OpenCode locally?

Continue: cloud-optional · OpenCode: partial. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.

Continue vs OpenCode — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Continue for developers who want a customizable in-IDE copilot. Choose OpenCode for a provider-agnostic Claude Code alternative.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.

Explore the directory →