Open-Source AI · Robotics & embodied AI

MuJoCo vs Gymnasium

MuJoCo vs Gymnasium compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. The physics engine most robotics research runs on vs The standard interface for reinforcement learning.

Updated regularly · curated by OpenSourceAI.tech

Choose MuJoCo for training control policies before touching real hardware. Choose Gymnasium for learning RL, or benchmarking an algorithm against a known baseline.

MuJoCo vs Gymnasium at a glance

SpecMuJoCoGymnasium
CategoryRobotics & embodied AIRobotics & embodied AI
TypePhysics simulatorRL environment API
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
Runs locallyYesYes
Primary languageC++Python
Ease of useIntermediateBeginner
Best fortraining control policies before touching real hardwarelearning RL, or benchmarking an algorithm against a known baseline
GitHub stars14.2k12.2k

How MuJoCo and Gymnasium score

🏆 Overall edge: Gymnasium — 4.6 vs 4.3 / 5
CriterionMuJoCoGymnasium
Popularity3.03.0
Maintenance5.05.0
Ease of use3.55.0
Privacy5.05.0
License freedom5.05.0

Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.

What each one is

MuJoCo

Physics simulator · Apache-2.0

MuJoCo simulates contact-rich dynamics fast and accurately. DeepMind open-sourced it, and it is now the default for reinforcement learning on robots.

  • Accurate contact dynamics at very high speed
  • Free since DeepMind released it
  • The de-facto standard in RL papers
See the MuJoCo page →

Gymnasium

RL environment API · MIT

Gymnasium is the maintained successor to OpenAI Gym: one API that every RL algorithm and environment speaks.

  • The interface the whole RL ecosystem implements
  • Dozens of environments included
  • Actively maintained, unlike the original Gym
See the Gymnasium page →

Key differences

MuJoCo is physics simulator, while Gymnasium is rL environment API. Their licenses differ (Apache-2.0 vs MIT), which matters if you ship a commercial product. MuJoCo leans more intermediate-friendly, whereas Gymnasium is more suited to beginner users. In short, MuJoCo fits training control policies before touching real hardware, and Gymnasium fits learning RL, or benchmarking an algorithm against a known baseline.

Which should you choose?

Choose MuJoCo for training control policies before touching real hardware. Choose Gymnasium for learning RL, or benchmarking an algorithm against a known baseline.

There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.

Frequently asked questions

Is MuJoCo or Gymnasium easier to use?

Gymnasium is generally the easier of the two to get started with, while MuJoCo rewards more setup with more control.

Are MuJoCo and Gymnasium free?

MuJoCo is free and open source (Apache-2.0), and Gymnasium is free and open source (MIT). Neither charges for the core software.

Can I run MuJoCo and Gymnasium locally?

MuJoCo: yes · Gymnasium: yes. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.

MuJoCo vs Gymnasium — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose MuJoCo for training control policies before touching real hardware. Choose Gymnasium for learning RL, or benchmarking an algorithm against a known baseline.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.

Explore the directory →