Open-Source AI · Robotics & embodied AI

MuJoCo vs Gazebo

MuJoCo vs Gazebo compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. The physics engine most robotics research runs on vs Simulate a whole robot, sensors included.

Updated regularly · curated by OpenSourceAI.tech

Choose MuJoCo for training control policies before touching real hardware. Choose Gazebo for testing a full robot stack, including cameras and lidar.

MuJoCo vs Gazebo at a glance

SpecMuJoCoGazebo
CategoryRobotics & embodied AIRobotics & embodied AI
TypePhysics simulatorRobot simulator
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
Runs locallyYesYes
Primary languageC++C++
Ease of useIntermediateIntermediate
Best fortraining control policies before touching real hardwaretesting a full robot stack, including cameras and lidar
GitHub stars14.2k1.4k

How MuJoCo and Gazebo score

🤝 Too close to call — MuJoCo and Gazebo land within a hair (4.3 vs 4.1 / 5). Pick on fit, not on score.
CriterionMuJoCoGazebo
Popularity3.02.0
Maintenance5.05.0
Ease of use3.53.5
Privacy5.05.0
License freedom5.05.0

Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.

What each one is

MuJoCo

Physics simulator · Apache-2.0

MuJoCo simulates contact-rich dynamics fast and accurately. DeepMind open-sourced it, and it is now the default for reinforcement learning on robots.

  • Accurate contact dynamics at very high speed
  • Free since DeepMind released it
  • The de-facto standard in RL papers
See the MuJoCo page →

Gazebo

Robot simulator · Apache-2.0

Gazebo simulates robots with their sensors and environment — the classic testing ground before deploying to real hardware.

  • Realistic sensor simulation
  • Tight ROS integration
  • Decades of robotics use behind it
Visit Gazebo →

Key differences

MuJoCo is physics simulator, while Gazebo is robot simulator. In short, MuJoCo fits training control policies before touching real hardware, and Gazebo fits testing a full robot stack, including cameras and lidar.

Which should you choose?

Choose MuJoCo for training control policies before touching real hardware. Choose Gazebo for testing a full robot stack, including cameras and lidar.

There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.

Frequently asked questions

Is MuJoCo or Gazebo easier to use?

Both sit at a similar level (Intermediate). Your choice should come down to fit rather than difficulty.

Are MuJoCo and Gazebo free?

MuJoCo is free and open source (Apache-2.0), and Gazebo is free and open source (Apache-2.0). Neither charges for the core software.

Can I run MuJoCo and Gazebo locally?

MuJoCo: yes · Gazebo: yes. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.

MuJoCo vs Gazebo — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose MuJoCo for training control policies before touching real hardware. Choose Gazebo for testing a full robot stack, including cameras and lidar.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.

Explore the directory →