Continue vs 
Plandex
Continue vs Plandex compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. Open-source autocomplete and chat in your IDE vs Plan-first agent for large codebases.
Updated regularly · curated by OpenSourceAI.tech
Continue vs Plandex at a glance
| Spec | Continue | Plandex |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Coding assistant | Coding assistant |
| Type | IDE extension | Terminal coding agent |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Runs locally | Cloud-optional | Cloud-optional |
| Primary language | TypeScript | Go |
| Ease of use | Beginner | Intermediate |
| Best for | developers who want a customizable in-IDE copilot | developers tackling large multi-file changes |
| GitHub stars | 34.8k | 15.5k |
How Continue and Plandex score
| Criterion | Continue | Plandex |
|---|---|---|
| Popularity | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Maintenance | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| Ease of use | 5.0 | 3.5 |
| Privacy | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| License freedom | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.
What each one is
Continue
Continue is an open-source IDE extension for VS Code and JetBrains that brings autocomplete, chat and edits using any model, including local ones via Ollama.
- Works in VS Code and JetBrains
- Bring any model, including local via Ollama
- Highly customizable context and commands
Plandex
Plandex is a terminal-based AI coding agent designed for large tasks and real codebases, with a plan-first workflow, diff review and cumulative context management.
- Plan-first workflow with reviewable diffs
- Handles very large contexts across files
- Terminal-native with git-friendly output
Key differences
Continue is iDE extension, while Plandex is terminal coding agent. Their licenses differ (Apache-2.0 vs MIT), which matters if you ship a commercial product. Continue leans more beginner-friendly, whereas Plandex is more suited to intermediate users. In short, Continue fits developers who want a customizable in-IDE copilot, and Plandex fits developers tackling large multi-file changes.
Which should you choose?
Choose Continue for developers who want a customizable in-IDE copilot. Choose Plandex for developers tackling large multi-file changes.
There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.
Frequently asked questions
Is Continue or Plandex easier to use?
Continue is generally the easier of the two to get started with, while Plandex rewards more setup with more control.
Are Continue and Plandex free?
Continue is free and open source (Apache-2.0), and Plandex is free and open source (MIT). Neither charges for the core software.
Can I run Continue and Plandex locally?
Continue: cloud-optional · Plandex: cloud-optional. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.
Continue vs Plandex — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose Continue for developers who want a customizable in-IDE copilot. Choose Plandex for developers tackling large multi-file changes.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.
Explore the directory →