Tabby vs 
Void
Tabby vs Void compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. Self-hosted Copilot alternative vs Open-source Cursor alternative on VS Code.
Updated regularly · curated by OpenSourceAI.tech
Tabby vs Void at a glance
| Spec | Tabby | Void |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Coding assistant | Coding assistant |
| Type | Self-hosted completion server | AI code editor |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Runs locally | Self-hosted | Yes |
| Primary language | Rust | TypeScript |
| Ease of use | Intermediate | Beginner |
| Best for | teams wanting fully self-hosted completions | a Cursor-like editor without the lock-in |
| GitHub stars | 33.7k | — |
Feature comparison
| Feature | Tabby | Void |
|---|---|---|
| Autocomplete | ✓ | ✓ |
| Chat | ✓ | ✓ |
| Agent mode | ✗ | ✓ |
| Local models | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-IDE | ✓ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✓ | ✗ |
How Tabby and Void score
| Criterion | Tabby | Void |
|---|---|---|
| Popularity | 4.0 | n/a |
| Maintenance | 5.0 | n/a |
| Ease of use | 3.5 | 5.0 |
| Privacy | 4.5 | 5.0 |
| License freedom | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.
What each one is
Tabby
Tabby is a self-hosted AI coding assistant that provides completions across editors without sending code to a third party, with a team server you run yourself.
- Fully self-hosted, code never leaves your network
- Editor-agnostic completions
- Team server with repository context
Void
Void is a VS Code fork with AI built in: tab autocomplete, inline edits and agent mode, with your keys and full support for local models — no data middleman.
- Familiar VS Code base with AI everywhere
- Direct provider connections — your keys, your data
- Agent and autocomplete work with local models
Key differences
Tabby is self-hosted completion server, while Void is aI code editor. Tabby leans more intermediate-friendly, whereas Void is more suited to beginner users. They also differ in how they run (Self-hosted vs Yes). In short, Tabby fits teams wanting fully self-hosted completions, and Void fits a Cursor-like editor without the lock-in.
Which should you choose?
Choose Tabby for teams wanting fully self-hosted completions. Choose Void for a Cursor-like editor without the lock-in.
There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.
Frequently asked questions
Is Tabby or Void easier to use?
Void is generally the easier of the two to get started with, while Tabby rewards more setup with more control.
Are Tabby and Void free?
Tabby is free and open source (Apache-2.0), and Void is free and open source (Apache-2.0). Neither charges for the core software.
Can I run Tabby and Void locally?
Tabby: self-hosted · Void: yes. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.
Tabby vs Void — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose Tabby for teams wanting fully self-hosted completions. Choose Void for a Cursor-like editor without the lock-in.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.
Explore the directory →