Tabby vs 
Sourcegraph Cody
Tabby vs Sourcegraph Cody compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. Self-hosted Copilot alternative vs Codebase-aware AI assistant.
Updated regularly · curated by OpenSourceAI.tech
Tabby vs Sourcegraph Cody at a glance
| Spec | Tabby | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Coding assistant | Coding assistant |
| Type | Self-hosted completion server | IDE assistant |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Runs locally | Self-hosted | No |
| Primary language | Rust | TypeScript |
| Ease of use | Intermediate | Beginner |
| Best for | teams wanting fully self-hosted completions | large codebases where context matters |
| GitHub stars | 33.7k | — |
How Tabby and Sourcegraph Cody score
| Criterion | Tabby | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Popularity | 4.0 | n/a |
| Maintenance | 5.0 | n/a |
| Ease of use | 3.5 | 5.0 |
| Privacy | 4.5 | 3.5 |
| License freedom | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.
What each one is
Tabby
Tabby is a self-hosted AI coding assistant that provides completions across editors without sending code to a third party, with a team server you run yourself.
- Fully self-hosted, code never leaves your network
- Editor-agnostic completions
- Team server with repository context
Sourcegraph Cody
Cody answers questions and writes code with full context of your repository, using code search to ground its answers in your actual codebase.
- Grounds answers in your real codebase
- Works across many IDEs
- Strong code search backing
Key differences
Tabby is self-hosted completion server, while Sourcegraph Cody is iDE assistant. Tabby leans more intermediate-friendly, whereas Sourcegraph Cody is more suited to beginner users. They also differ in how they run (Self-hosted vs No). In short, Tabby fits teams wanting fully self-hosted completions, and Sourcegraph Cody fits large codebases where context matters.
Which should you choose?
Choose Tabby for teams wanting fully self-hosted completions. Choose Sourcegraph Cody for large codebases where context matters.
There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.
Frequently asked questions
Is Tabby or Sourcegraph Cody easier to use?
Sourcegraph Cody is generally the easier of the two to get started with, while Tabby rewards more setup with more control.
Are Tabby and Sourcegraph Cody free?
Tabby is free and open source (Apache-2.0), and Sourcegraph Cody is free and open source (Apache-2.0). Neither charges for the core software.
Can I run Tabby and Sourcegraph Cody locally?
Tabby: self-hosted · Sourcegraph Cody: no. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.
Tabby vs Sourcegraph Cody — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose Tabby for teams wanting fully self-hosted completions. Choose Sourcegraph Cody for large codebases where context matters.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.
Explore the directory →