Open-Source AI · Robotics & embodied AI

Stable-Baselines3 vs Gymnasium

Stable-Baselines3 vs Gymnasium compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. Reliable RL algorithms you can actually trust vs The standard interface for reinforcement learning.

Updated regularly · curated by OpenSourceAI.tech

Choose Stable-Baselines3 for getting a working policy without reimplementing PPO from a paper. Choose Gymnasium for learning RL, or benchmarking an algorithm against a known baseline.

Stable-Baselines3 vs Gymnasium at a glance

SpecStable-Baselines3Gymnasium
CategoryRobotics & embodied AIRobotics & embodied AI
TypeRL algorithmsRL environment API
LicenseMITMIT
Runs locallyYesYes
Primary languagePythonPython
Ease of useBeginnerBeginner
Best forgetting a working policy without reimplementing PPO from a paperlearning RL, or benchmarking an algorithm against a known baseline
GitHub stars13.6k12.2k

How Stable-Baselines3 and Gymnasium score

🤝 Too close to call — Stable-Baselines3 and Gymnasium land within a hair (4.6 vs 4.6 / 5). Pick on fit, not on score.
CriterionStable-Baselines3Gymnasium
Popularity3.03.0
Maintenance5.05.0
Ease of use5.05.0
Privacy5.05.0
License freedom5.05.0

Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.

What each one is

Stable-Baselines3

RL algorithms · MIT

Stable-Baselines3 provides carefully tested PyTorch implementations of the main RL algorithms — PPO, SAC, TD3 — with sane defaults.

  • Implementations verified against published results
  • Excellent documentation
  • Works out of the box with Gymnasium
See the Stable-Baselines3 page →

Gymnasium

RL environment API · MIT

Gymnasium is the maintained successor to OpenAI Gym: one API that every RL algorithm and environment speaks.

  • The interface the whole RL ecosystem implements
  • Dozens of environments included
  • Actively maintained, unlike the original Gym
See the Gymnasium page →

Key differences

Stable-Baselines3 is rL algorithms, while Gymnasium is rL environment API. In short, Stable-Baselines3 fits getting a working policy without reimplementing PPO from a paper, and Gymnasium fits learning RL, or benchmarking an algorithm against a known baseline.

Which should you choose?

Choose Stable-Baselines3 for getting a working policy without reimplementing PPO from a paper. Choose Gymnasium for learning RL, or benchmarking an algorithm against a known baseline.

There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.

Frequently asked questions

Is Stable-Baselines3 or Gymnasium easier to use?

Both sit at a similar level (Beginner). Your choice should come down to fit rather than difficulty.

Are Stable-Baselines3 and Gymnasium free?

Stable-Baselines3 is free and open source (MIT), and Gymnasium is free and open source (MIT). Neither charges for the core software.

Can I run Stable-Baselines3 and Gymnasium locally?

Stable-Baselines3: yes · Gymnasium: yes. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.

Stable-Baselines3 vs Gymnasium — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Stable-Baselines3 for getting a working policy without reimplementing PPO from a paper. Choose Gymnasium for learning RL, or benchmarking an algorithm against a known baseline.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.

Explore the directory →