Open-Source AI · Robotics & embodied AI

PX4 vs Gazebo

PX4 vs Gazebo compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. The autopilot behind most commercial drones vs Simulate a whole robot, sensors included.

Updated regularly · curated by OpenSourceAI.tech

Choose PX4 for building a drone product rather than a hobby project. Choose Gazebo for testing a full robot stack, including cameras and lidar.

PX4 vs Gazebo at a glance

SpecPX4Gazebo
CategoryRobotics & embodied AIRobotics & embodied AI
TypeDrone autopilotRobot simulator
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseApache-2.0
Runs locallyYesYes
Primary languageC++C++
Ease of useAdvancedIntermediate
Best forbuilding a drone product rather than a hobby projecttesting a full robot stack, including cameras and lidar
GitHub stars12.1k1.4k

How PX4 and Gazebo score

🤝 Too close to call — PX4 and Gazebo land within a hair (4.1 vs 4.1 / 5). Pick on fit, not on score.
CriterionPX4Gazebo
Popularity3.02.0
Maintenance5.05.0
Ease of use2.53.5
Privacy5.05.0
License freedom5.05.0

Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.

What each one is

PX4

Drone autopilot · BSD-3-Clause

PX4 is the flight control stack used across research and industry, with a clean architecture and a strong simulation story.

  • Modular architecture, easy to extend
  • Excellent simulation and testing tooling
  • Strong industrial adoption
See the PX4 page →

Gazebo

Robot simulator · Apache-2.0

Gazebo simulates robots with their sensors and environment — the classic testing ground before deploying to real hardware.

  • Realistic sensor simulation
  • Tight ROS integration
  • Decades of robotics use behind it
Visit Gazebo →

Key differences

PX4 is drone autopilot, while Gazebo is robot simulator. Their licenses differ (BSD-3-Clause vs Apache-2.0), which matters if you ship a commercial product. PX4 leans more advanced-friendly, whereas Gazebo is more suited to intermediate users. In short, PX4 fits building a drone product rather than a hobby project, and Gazebo fits testing a full robot stack, including cameras and lidar.

Which should you choose?

Choose PX4 for building a drone product rather than a hobby project. Choose Gazebo for testing a full robot stack, including cameras and lidar.

There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.

Frequently asked questions

Is PX4 or Gazebo easier to use?

Gazebo is generally the easier of the two to get started with, while PX4 rewards more setup with more control.

Are PX4 and Gazebo free?

PX4 is free and open source (BSD-3-Clause), and Gazebo is free and open source (Apache-2.0). Neither charges for the core software.

Can I run PX4 and Gazebo locally?

PX4: yes · Gazebo: yes. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.

PX4 vs Gazebo — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose PX4 for building a drone product rather than a hobby project. Choose Gazebo for testing a full robot stack, including cameras and lidar.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.

Explore the directory →