Open-Source AI · AI agent framework

OpenHands vs Google ADK

OpenHands vs Google ADK compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. AI developer that writes and runs code vs Google's official Agent Development Kit.

Updated regularly · curated by OpenSourceAI.tech

Choose OpenHands for autonomous end-to-end coding tasks. Choose Google ADK for production agents on the Google/Gemini stack.

OpenHands vs Google ADK at a glance

SpecOpenHandsGoogle ADK
CategoryAI agent frameworkAI agent framework
TypeAutonomous coding agentAgent framework
LicenseMITApache-2.0
Runs locallyCloud-optionalPartial
Primary languagePythonPython
Ease of useAdvancedIntermediate
Best forautonomous end-to-end coding tasksproduction agents on the Google/Gemini stack
GitHub stars20.6k

How OpenHands and Google ADK score

🏆 Overall edge: Google ADK — 4.1 vs 3.7 / 5
CriterionOpenHandsGoogle ADK
Popularityn/a3.5
Maintenancen/a5.0
Ease of use2.53.5
Privacy3.53.5
License freedom5.05.0

Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.

What each one is

OpenHands

Autonomous coding agent · MIT

OpenHands (formerly OpenDevin) is an autonomous software-engineering agent that can write code, run commands, browse the web and fix issues like a human developer.

  • Acts like a real developer: edits, runs, tests
  • Strong SWE-bench performance
  • Open alternative to Devin
Visit OpenHands →

Google ADK

Agent framework · Apache-2.0

ADK is Google's code-first framework for building, evaluating and deploying agents: hierarchical multi-agent systems, workflow control, built-in eval and a path to Vertex AI.

  • Model-agnostic but optimized for Gemini
  • Workflow agents give deterministic orchestration
  • Built-in evaluation and deployment story
See the Google ADK page →

Key differences

OpenHands is autonomous coding agent, while Google ADK is agent framework. Their licenses differ (MIT vs Apache-2.0), which matters if you ship a commercial product. OpenHands leans more advanced-friendly, whereas Google ADK is more suited to intermediate users. They also differ in how they run (Cloud-optional vs Partial). In short, OpenHands fits autonomous end-to-end coding tasks, and Google ADK fits production agents on the Google/Gemini stack.

Which should you choose?

Choose OpenHands for autonomous end-to-end coding tasks. Choose Google ADK for production agents on the Google/Gemini stack.

There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenHands or Google ADK easier to use?

Google ADK is generally the easier of the two to get started with, while OpenHands rewards more setup with more control.

Are OpenHands and Google ADK free?

OpenHands is free and open source (MIT), and Google ADK is free and open source (Apache-2.0). Neither charges for the core software.

Can I run OpenHands and Google ADK locally?

OpenHands: cloud-optional · Google ADK: partial. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.

OpenHands vs Google ADK — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose OpenHands for autonomous end-to-end coding tasks. Choose Google ADK for production agents on the Google/Gemini stack.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.

Explore the directory →