Open-Source AI · Robotics & embodied AI

Gymnasium vs Habitat

Gymnasium vs Habitat compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. The standard interface for reinforcement learning vs Train agents to act in photorealistic homes.

Updated regularly · curated by OpenSourceAI.tech

Choose Gymnasium for learning RL, or benchmarking an algorithm against a known baseline. Choose Habitat for embodied AI research on navigation and household tasks.

Gymnasium vs Habitat at a glance

SpecGymnasiumHabitat
CategoryRobotics & embodied AIRobotics & embodied AI
TypeRL environment APIEmbodied AI simulator
LicenseMITMIT
Runs locallyYesYes
Primary languagePythonPython
Ease of useBeginnerIntermediate
Best forlearning RL, or benchmarking an algorithm against a known baselineembodied AI research on navigation and household tasks
GitHub stars12.2k3.1k

How Gymnasium and Habitat score

🏆 Overall edge: Gymnasium — 4.6 vs 4.1 / 5
CriterionGymnasiumHabitat
Popularity3.02.5
Maintenance5.04.5
Ease of use5.03.5
Privacy5.05.0
License freedom5.05.0

Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.

What each one is

Gymnasium

RL environment API · MIT

Gymnasium is the maintained successor to OpenAI Gym: one API that every RL algorithm and environment speaks.

  • The interface the whole RL ecosystem implements
  • Dozens of environments included
  • Actively maintained, unlike the original Gym
See the Gymnasium page →

Habitat

Embodied AI simulator · MIT

Habitat simulates indoor environments at thousands of frames per second so agents can learn navigation and object manipulation from vision.

  • Extremely fast photorealistic simulation
  • Large library of scanned real homes
  • The standard benchmark for embodied navigation
See the Habitat page →

Key differences

Gymnasium is rL environment API, while Habitat is embodied AI simulator. Gymnasium leans more beginner-friendly, whereas Habitat is more suited to intermediate users. In short, Gymnasium fits learning RL, or benchmarking an algorithm against a known baseline, and Habitat fits embodied AI research on navigation and household tasks.

Which should you choose?

Choose Gymnasium for learning RL, or benchmarking an algorithm against a known baseline. Choose Habitat for embodied AI research on navigation and household tasks.

There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.

Frequently asked questions

Is Gymnasium or Habitat easier to use?

Gymnasium is generally the easier of the two to get started with, while Habitat rewards more setup with more control.

Are Gymnasium and Habitat free?

Gymnasium is free and open source (MIT), and Habitat is free and open source (MIT). Neither charges for the core software.

Can I run Gymnasium and Habitat locally?

Gymnasium: yes · Habitat: yes. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.

Gymnasium vs Habitat — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Gymnasium for learning RL, or benchmarking an algorithm against a known baseline. Choose Habitat for embodied AI research on navigation and household tasks.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.

Explore the directory →