Open-Source AI · Low-code AI builder

Flowise vs Windmill

Flowise vs Windmill compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. Drag-and-drop LLM flows vs Turn scripts into workflows and UIs.

Updated regularly · curated by OpenSourceAI.tech

Choose Flowise for builders who want fast visual prototyping. Choose Windmill for developer-first internal tooling.

Flowise vs Windmill at a glance

SpecFlowiseWindmill
CategoryLow-code AI builderLow-code AI builder
TypeVisual LLM builderWorkflow platform
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
Runs locallySelf-hostedYes
Primary languageTypeScriptRust
Ease of useBeginnerIntermediate
Best forbuilders who want fast visual prototypingdeveloper-first internal tooling
GitHub stars54.7k

How Flowise and Windmill score

🏆 Overall edge: Flowise — 4.8 vs 4.0 / 5
CriterionFlowiseWindmill
Popularity4.5n/a
Maintenance5.0n/a
Ease of use5.03.5
Privacy4.55.0
License freedom5.03.5

Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.

What each one is

Flowise

Visual LLM builder · Apache-2.0

Flowise is a drag-and-drop builder for LLM apps and agents, letting you assemble chains, tools and RAG visually on top of LangChain primitives.

  • Fast drag-and-drop flow building
  • Built on familiar LangChain primitives
  • Quick to prototype chatbots and agents
See the Flowise page →

Windmill

Workflow platform · AGPL-3.0

Windmill turns Python, TypeScript or SQL scripts into workflows, schedules and internal apps, with AI steps as first-class citizens.

  • Scripts first, UI generated for you
  • Very fast execution engine
  • Self-hosted, no vendor lock-in
Visit Windmill →

Key differences

Flowise is visual LLM builder, while Windmill is workflow platform. Their licenses differ (Apache-2.0 vs AGPL-3.0), which matters if you ship a commercial product. Flowise leans more beginner-friendly, whereas Windmill is more suited to intermediate users. They also differ in how they run (Self-hosted vs Yes). In short, Flowise fits builders who want fast visual prototyping, and Windmill fits developer-first internal tooling.

Which should you choose?

Choose Flowise for builders who want fast visual prototyping. Choose Windmill for developer-first internal tooling.

There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.

Frequently asked questions

Is Flowise or Windmill easier to use?

Flowise is generally the easier of the two to get started with, while Windmill rewards more setup with more control.

Are Flowise and Windmill free?

Flowise is free and open source (Apache-2.0), and Windmill is free and open source (AGPL-3.0). Neither charges for the core software.

Can I run Flowise and Windmill locally?

Flowise: self-hosted · Windmill: yes. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.

Flowise vs Windmill — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Flowise for builders who want fast visual prototyping. Choose Windmill for developer-first internal tooling.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.

Explore the directory →