Open-Source AI · AI agent framework

Composio vs Julep

Composio vs Julep compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. 250+ ready-made tools for your agents vs Stateful agents as a service.

Updated regularly · curated by OpenSourceAI.tech

Choose Composio for agents that must act on real SaaS accounts. Choose Julep for agents that must run for days, not seconds.

Composio vs Julep at a glance

SpecComposioJulep
CategoryAI agent frameworkAI agent framework
TypeTool integration layerAgent backend
LicenseElastic-2.0Apache-2.0
Runs locallyCloud-optionalYes
Primary languagePythonPython
Ease of useBeginnerIntermediate
Best foragents that must act on real SaaS accountsagents that must run for days, not seconds
GitHub stars29.2k6.6k

How Composio and Julep score

🤝 Too close to call — Composio and Julep land within a hair (4.1 vs 4.2 / 5). Pick on fit, not on score.
CriterionComposioJulep
Popularity3.52.5
Maintenance5.05.0
Ease of use5.03.5
Privacy3.55.0
License freedom3.55.0

Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.

What each one is

Composio

Tool integration layer · Elastic-2.0

Composio gives agents production-ready integrations (GitHub, Slack, Gmail, Notion and 250+ more) with managed auth, so agents can act on real accounts safely.

  • 250+ integrations with managed auth
  • Works with every major agent framework
  • Handles OAuth pain for you
See the Composio page →

Julep

Agent backend · Apache-2.0

Julep provides a backend for long-running, stateful agents with persistent memory and scheduled tasks, so your agents survive restarts.

  • Persistent state across sessions
  • Scheduled and long-running tasks
  • Self-hostable backend
See the Julep page →

Key differences

Composio is tool integration layer, while Julep is agent backend. Their licenses differ (Elastic-2.0 vs Apache-2.0), which matters if you ship a commercial product. Composio leans more beginner-friendly, whereas Julep is more suited to intermediate users. They also differ in how they run (Cloud-optional vs Yes). In short, Composio fits agents that must act on real SaaS accounts, and Julep fits agents that must run for days, not seconds.

Which should you choose?

Choose Composio for agents that must act on real SaaS accounts. Choose Julep for agents that must run for days, not seconds.

There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.

Frequently asked questions

Is Composio or Julep easier to use?

Composio is generally the easier of the two to get started with, while Julep rewards more setup with more control.

Are Composio and Julep free?

Composio is free and open source (Elastic-2.0), and Julep is free and open source (Apache-2.0). Neither charges for the core software.

Can I run Composio and Julep locally?

Composio: cloud-optional · Julep: yes. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.

Composio vs Julep — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Composio for agents that must act on real SaaS accounts. Choose Julep for agents that must run for days, not seconds.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.

Explore the directory →