Open-Source AI · AI agent framework

Agno vs Composio

Agno vs Composio compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. Fast, lightweight multi-modal agents vs 250+ ready-made tools for your agents.

Updated regularly · curated by OpenSourceAI.tech

Choose Agno for fast agents with memory and tools. Choose Composio for agents that must act on real SaaS accounts.

Agno vs Composio at a glance

SpecAgnoComposio
CategoryAI agent frameworkAI agent framework
TypeAgent frameworkTool integration layer
LicenseMPL-2.0Elastic-2.0
Runs locallyCloud-optionalCloud-optional
Primary languagePythonPython
Ease of useIntermediateBeginner
Best forfast agents with memory and toolsagents that must act on real SaaS accounts
GitHub stars41.1k29.2k

How Agno and Composio score

🤝 Too close to call — Agno and Composio land within a hair (3.9 vs 4.1 / 5). Pick on fit, not on score.
CriterionAgnoComposio
Popularity4.03.5
Maintenance5.05.0
Ease of use3.55.0
Privacy3.53.5
License freedom3.53.5

Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.

What each one is

Agno

Agent framework · MPL-2.0

Agno (formerly Phidata) is a lightweight, high-performance framework for building multi-modal agents with memory, knowledge and tools, plus a monitoring UI.

  • Very fast agent instantiation
  • Built-in memory, knowledge and tools
  • Multi-modal and model-agnostic
See the Agno page →

Composio

Tool integration layer · Elastic-2.0

Composio gives agents production-ready integrations (GitHub, Slack, Gmail, Notion and 250+ more) with managed auth, so agents can act on real accounts safely.

  • 250+ integrations with managed auth
  • Works with every major agent framework
  • Handles OAuth pain for you
See the Composio page →

Key differences

Agno is agent framework, while Composio is tool integration layer. Their licenses differ (MPL-2.0 vs Elastic-2.0), which matters if you ship a commercial product. Agno leans more intermediate-friendly, whereas Composio is more suited to beginner users. In short, Agno fits fast agents with memory and tools, and Composio fits agents that must act on real SaaS accounts.

Which should you choose?

Choose Agno for fast agents with memory and tools. Choose Composio for agents that must act on real SaaS accounts.

There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.

Frequently asked questions

Is Agno or Composio easier to use?

Composio is generally the easier of the two to get started with, while Agno rewards more setup with more control.

Are Agno and Composio free?

Agno is free and open source (MPL-2.0), and Composio is free and open source (Elastic-2.0). Neither charges for the core software.

Can I run Agno and Composio locally?

Agno: cloud-optional · Composio: cloud-optional. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.

Agno vs Composio — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Agno for fast agents with memory and tools. Choose Composio for agents that must act on real SaaS accounts.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.

Explore the directory →