Open-Source AI · Low-code AI builder

Activepieces vs Kestra

Activepieces vs Kestra compared for 2026 — features, license, ease of use, performance and which one to choose. Open-source Zapier with AI pieces vs Declarative orchestration with AI steps.

Updated regularly · curated by OpenSourceAI.tech

Choose Activepieces for teams automating workflows without vendor lock-in. Choose Kestra for data pipelines that include AI steps.

Activepieces vs Kestra at a glance

SpecActivepiecesKestra
CategoryLow-code AI builderLow-code AI builder
TypeAutomation platformOrchestration platform
LicenseMITApache-2.0
Runs locallySelf-hostedYes
Primary languageTypeScriptJava
Ease of useBeginnerIntermediate
Best forteams automating workflows without vendor lock-indata pipelines that include AI steps
GitHub stars23.3k27.4k

How Activepieces and Kestra score

🤝 Too close to call — Activepieces and Kestra land within a hair (4.6 vs 4.4 / 5). Pick on fit, not on score.
CriterionActivepiecesKestra
Popularity3.53.5
Maintenance5.05.0
Ease of use5.03.5
Privacy4.55.0
License freedom5.05.0

Scores are computed automatically from public signals — GitHub stars (popularity), recent commit activity (maintenance), license type (freedom), local-first design (privacy) and onboarding complexity (ease of use). Indicative, not a verdict.

What each one is

Activepieces

Automation platform · MIT

Activepieces is an open-source automation platform (a Zapier alternative) with hundreds of connectors and first-class AI steps, self-hostable via Docker.

  • Hundreds of connectors, no-code editor
  • AI steps as first-class citizens
  • MIT core, simple Docker self-hosting
See the Activepieces page →

Kestra

Orchestration platform · Apache-2.0

Kestra orchestrates data and AI workflows declaratively in YAML, with a UI, scheduling and hundreds of plugins.

  • Declarative YAML workflows
  • Handles large data pipelines
  • Rich plugin ecosystem
See the Kestra page →

Key differences

Activepieces is automation platform, while Kestra is orchestration platform. Their licenses differ (MIT vs Apache-2.0), which matters if you ship a commercial product. Activepieces leans more beginner-friendly, whereas Kestra is more suited to intermediate users. They also differ in how they run (Self-hosted vs Yes). In short, Activepieces fits teams automating workflows without vendor lock-in, and Kestra fits data pipelines that include AI steps.

Which should you choose?

Choose Activepieces for teams automating workflows without vendor lock-in. Choose Kestra for data pipelines that include AI steps.

There is rarely one winner — many setups use both. The right pick depends on your hardware, your team's skills, and whether you value simplicity or control.

Frequently asked questions

Is Activepieces or Kestra easier to use?

Activepieces is generally the easier of the two to get started with, while Kestra rewards more setup with more control.

Are Activepieces and Kestra free?

Activepieces is free and open source (MIT), and Kestra is free and open source (Apache-2.0). Neither charges for the core software.

Can I run Activepieces and Kestra locally?

Activepieces: self-hosted · Kestra: yes. Both can be used without sending your data to a third-party cloud where their setup allows.

Activepieces vs Kestra — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Activepieces for teams automating workflows without vendor lock-in. Choose Kestra for data pipelines that include AI steps.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse thousands of open-source AI tools, models and projects — all curated in one place, updated daily.

Explore the directory →