Home › Media models

Media models: where does open-source stand?

Human-preference rankings for image, video and speech models — open-weight models placed side by side with the proprietary frontier. No marketing, no benchmark theatre: real people compared the outputs blind and voted.

Loading…
I want to…
Loading rankings…
How this is ranked: these are ELO scores from blind human preference — people are shown two outputs from the same prompt, without knowing which model produced them, and pick the one they prefer. It is the only honest way to rank media models: no automated benchmark can tell you whether an image is good. A higher ELO means people preferred it more often. The votes column shows how many comparisons back the score — a model with few votes has a less reliable position.

Open-weight means the model can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. The ranking API does not say whether a model is open, so we identify them by model family. Where we cannot confirm it either way, we mark the model unverified rather than guess — and the "best open-weight" figure above only counts models we can actually confirm. We would rather understate open-source than mislead you. Spotted a mistake?

Rankings by Artificial Analysis.